[ad_1]
In an October 4, 2022, Fox Information interview, civil rights legal professional Aaron Siri, authorized counsel for the Knowledgeable Consent Motion Community (ICAN), shared surprising V-Protected information obtained from the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention after a number of authorized calls for.
For greater than 15 months, the CDC fought to not launch any of those information. ICAN needed to file two lawsuits and a number of appeals to get the CDC handy it over, and whenever you see the information, you perceive why.
What Is V-Protected?
By now, many know concerning the existence of the Vaccine Adversarial Occasions Reporting System (VAERS), a publicly out there database for vaccine adversarial occasion reviews, collectively managed by the CDC and the U.S. Meals and Drug Administration.
V-Protected1 is one other database managed and monitored by the CDC. It is a voluntary “after vaccination well being checker” deployed to gather information on those that obtained the COVID jab.
Anybody in america can enroll in V-Protected, utilizing their smartphone, after receiving any dose of COVID-19 vaccine. Mother and father also can enroll their underage kids to maintain tabs on well being results. Through the first week after every dose, V-Protected will ship you a each day textual content message asking for particulars in your well being and well-being. After that, check-ins are despatched out on an intermittent foundation.
What Does V-Protected Present?
So, what does the V-Protected information, which the CDC was so reluctant to launch, really present? Are the COVID jabs as innocent as they’re claimed to be? Removed from it.
As detailed by Siri, out of the ten million individuals enrolled in V-Protected, 7.7% (770,000 individuals) required medical care after getting the shot and 25% (2.5 million individuals) missed work or faculty or suffered a critical facet impact that affected their day-to-day life.
As famous by Siri, these numbers are extraordinary. One of many key messages we got was that whereas COVID was not a major risk to all individuals, getting the shot would restrict the variety of hospitalizations, deaths and days missed from work as a consequence of an infection.
Properly, we now see that 25% of those that obtained the shot ended up lacking work or faculty due to the unwanted side effects, and seven.7% wanted medical care. That is staggering, and fully nullifies the CDC’s argument that everybody ought to get the shot, whether or not they’re in a high-risk class or not, and whether or not they’ve already had COVID-19 or not.
Large Immune Response Sign
The V-Protected information additionally present a large sign with regard to the jab inflicting an adversarial immune response. 4 million individuals, out of the ten million — 40% — reported joint ache. Two million, or 20%, reported “average” joint ache and 400,000, or 4%, categorized the ache as “extreme.”
As famous by Siri, joint ache is usually an indication of an immune response and might be trigger for concern when it happens after vaccination, particularly when you think about that the photographs had been supposed to guard the aged, who already are inclined to have joint issues.
The V-Protected database additionally reveals that although fewer doses of Moderna had been registered, it is mRNA shot accounts for a bigger portion of destructive results, in comparison with Pfizer’s jab.
ICAN has now constructed a searchable dashboard of this V-Safe data.2 Within the video beneath, Albert Benavides (who goes by the title Welcome the Eagle 88), an RCM professional, information analyst and auditor, gives a tour and overview of learn how to use the dashboard, together with a few of its strengths and weaknesses.
Why Did the CDC Battle to Hold V-Protected Knowledge Hidden?
In an October 5, 2022, Substack article, Steve Kirsch commented on the V-Protected information dump:3
“V-Protected is a voluntary security monitoring program put in place by the CDC to watch adversarial reactions after individuals take a vaccine. The V-Protected information exhibits that 33.1% of the individuals who obtained the vaccine suffered from a major adversarial occasion and seven.7% needed to search skilled medical care.
These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly present the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC intentionally hid this info from the American public, and that the drug corporations falsified the information within the trials … the CDC isn’t defending the American individuals. They’re defending the producers of the vaccines.”
As famous by Kirsch, unwanted side effects might be both under- or overestimated in V-Protected, or each, as some may ignore V-Protected requests to reply questions, and others could solely enroll or be incentivized to fill out the questionnaire in the event that they undergo an issue.
Moreover, the choices for reporting a facet impact are predefined and really generic, so individuals could be experiencing results that did not match any of the predefined classes of damage. Importantly, loss of life isn’t reportable to V-Protected, as useless individuals can’t use their telephones. So, now we have no approach of understanding what number of of those 10 million registered V-Protected customers have died.
Nonetheless, “Whether or not the charges in V-Protected is over-reported or under-reported is a crimson herring,” Kirsch says. “The problem that ought to concern everyone seems to be the CDC hid all of the V-Protected information from everybody your entire time.”
Along with spending taxpayer {dollars} to forestall the discharge of this info — which now we have each proper to — the CDC additionally stopped selling use of V-Protected round Might 2021, mere months into the COVID jab rollout. As famous by Kirsch, this was most likely as a result of “it grew to become crystal clear that it was accumulating information that confirmed the vaccines had been unsafe.”
CDC Ignored Clear ‘Demise’ Sign
In an October 3, 2022, article,4 Kirsch additionally factors out that the formulation the CDC makes use of to set off security alerts — described in its VAERS normal working procedures guide5 — is “significantly flawed.” May that be intentional as nicely?
In July 2021, Matthew Crawford revealed a three-part collection6,7,8 on how the CDC was hiding security alerts. In August 2021, Kirsch additionally knowledgeable the company of those issues, however was, after all, ignored. Nonetheless, “even utilizing their very own flawed formulation, ‘loss of life’ ought to have triggered a sign,” he writes. But the CDC didn’t notify the general public of what they’d discovered. This is an excerpt from Kirsch article:9
“If you’d like goal proof of whole ineptitude by the CDC and the medical group in monitoring the protection of the COVID vaccines, that is the article you’ve got been ready for. We use their numbers and their very own algorithm and present that it ought to have triggered a security sign for ‘loss of life.’
There isn’t a approach they’ll argue their approach out of this one … We want look no additional than the vaccine security sign monitoring formulation10 utilized by the CDC to show our level …
The formulation the CDC makes use of for producing security alerts is essentially flawed; a ‘dangerous’ vaccine with plenty of adversarial occasions will ‘masks’ giant numbers of essential security alerts … Let me summarize the important thing factors for you in a nutshell:
PRR [proportional reporting ratio] is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc11 as follows …
A ‘security sign’ is outlined on web page 16 within the CDC doc as a PRR of a minimum of 2, chi-squared statistic of a minimum of 4, and 3 or extra instances of the AE [adverse event] following receipt of the precise vaccine of curiosity. That is the well-known ‘and clause.’ Right here it’s from the doc:
Solely somebody who’s incompetent or is intentionally making an attempt to make the vaccines look secure would use the phrase ‘and‘ within the definition of a security sign. Utilizing ‘and’ implies that if any one of many situations is not happy, no security sign will probably be generated. As famous beneath, the PRR will not often set off which just about ensures that almost all occasions generated by an unsafe vaccine won’t ever get flagged.
The PRR worth for the COVID vaccines will not often exceed 1 as a result of there are such a lot of adversarial occasions from the COVID vaccine as a result of it’s so harmful (i.e., B within the formulation is a large quantity) so the numerator is at all times close to zero. Therefore, the ‘security sign’ isn’t triggered as a result of the vaccine is so harmful.”
A Fictitious Instance
Utilizing a fictitious vaccine as the instance, Kirsch goes on to clarify how an exceptionally harmful vaccine will fly below the radar and never get flagged, due to the CDC’s flawed formulation:12
“Suppose now we have the world’s most harmful vaccine that causes adversarial occasions in everybody who will get it and generates 25,000 totally different adversarial occasions, and every adversarial occasion has 1,000 cases.
That implies that the numerator is 1,000/25,000,000 which is simply 40 occasions per million reported occasions. Now let’s take a look at actuals for one thing like deaths. For all different vaccines, there are 6,200 deaths and 1 million adversarial occasions whole.
Since 40 per million is lower than 6,200 deaths per million, we aren’t even near producing a security sign for deaths from our hypothetical vaccine which killed 1,000 individuals in a yr … The purpose is {that a} harmful vaccine can look very ‘secure’ utilizing the PRR formulation.”
Calculating Demise Sign for COVID Jab
Subsequent, Kirsch calculates the PRR (proportional reporting ratio) for loss of life for the COVID jab, utilizing VAERS information and the CDC’s definitions and formulation.
As of December 31, 2019, there have been 6,157 deaths and 918,717 adversarial occasions whole for all vaccines aside from the COVID shot. As of September 23, 2022, there have been 31,214 deaths and 1.4 million adversarial occasions whole for the COVID jabs. This is the formulation as defined by Kirsch:13
“PRR = (31,214/1.4e6) / (6,157/918,717) = 3.32, which exceeds the required threshold of two. In different phrases, the COVID vaccine is so lethal that even with all of the adversarial occasions generated by the vaccine, the loss of life sign didn’t get drowned out!
However there may be nonetheless the chi-square take a look at. Chi-square take a look at outcomes had been 18,549 for ‘loss of life,’ which vastly exceeds the required threshold of 4. The CDC chi-square take a look at is clearly happy for the COVID vaccine. As a result of the loss of life sign is so large, it even survived the PRR take a look at.
Because of this even utilizing the CDCs personal misguided … formulation, all three standards had been happy:
1. PRR>2 [PRR greater than 2]: It was 3.32
2. Chi-square>2 [Chi-square greater than 2]: It was 18,549
3. 3 or extra reviews: There have been over 31,214 loss of life reviews obtained by VAERS … which is greater than 3
A security sign ought to have been generated however wasn’t. Why not? … Does anybody care? A whole lot of 1000’s of American lives have been misplaced because of the incapacity of the CDC to deploy their very own flawed security sign evaluation …
It has been recognized since a minimum of 2004 that utilizing reporting odds ratio (ROR) is a greater estimate of relative threat than PRR.14 I do not know why the CDC would not use it.”
CDC Can not Declare It Did not Know
The CDC is answerable for monitoring each VAERS and V-Protected, and between these two databases, there is not any doable approach they might ever say they did not know the photographs had been harming and killing tens of millions of People.
The CDC additionally has entry to different databases, together with the Protection Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which (earlier than it was deliberately altered15) confirmed large will increase in debilitating and deadly situations, together with a tripling of most cancers instances.16
The findings in these databases have by no means been introduced ahead throughout any of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) conferences or the FDA’s Vaccines and Associated Organic Merchandise Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) conferences, at which members have repeatedly voted to authorize the jabs to individuals of all ages, together with infants and pregnant girls.
If the CDC was actually monitoring these databases, as required, there’s merely no approach they might have continued to authorize these photographs primarily based on the information. Is that why these information had been by no means reviewed? In all probability. ACIP and VRBPAC members, for no matter motive, merely did not wish to know the reality. However the CDC has recognized all alongside, and there is not any excuse for not sharing and performing on that information.
Assist Unfold the Phrase
The media are ignoring all of this — the V-Protected information and the CDC’s failure to behave on a transparent security sign (and the sign being loss of life, of all issues!), even when utilizing a formulation that was flawed from the beginning. So, unfold the phrase. Everybody must know these information. It is not hypothesis, it is the CDC’s personal information.
The CDC wants to clarify why they spent our tax {dollars} to struggle the discharge of the V-Protected information for 15 months, and why they did not halt the photographs when a “loss of life” sign was evident. The mainstream press, members of Congress, the medical group and Universities additionally want to clarify why they refuse to research these CDC information. To that finish, listed here are a couple of solutions for how one can assist:
| Assist Sen. Ron Johnson, at the moment the one senator prepared to research the reality of the COVID jabs. |
| Write or name your members of Congress and ask them to research the CDC’s security monitoring. As famous by Kirsch, “You merely can’t have a security company not have the ability to monitor security.” |
| Contact your native newspaper and urge them to research and report on the V-Protected information, the VAERS information and the CDC’s failure to behave when a security sign was detected. |
| Share the information on social media and ask why nobody within the media, Congress, academia or medical group is investigating these issues. |
| Share this info together with your physician and members of the medical group. |
| Additionally share it with college directors, and ask them to clarify how and why, in gentle of those information, they’re nonetheless mandating COVID photographs for his or her college students. |
[ad_2]
